Judul : People Power Party Rep. Choo Rejects 'Forced Logic' in Insurrection Case
link : People Power Party Rep. Choo Rejects 'Forced Logic' in Insurrection Case
People Power Party Rep. Choo Rejects 'Forced Logic' in Insurrection Case
Rep. Choo Kyung-ho of the People Power Party systematically denied each element of the arrest motion submitted to the National Assembly on the 13th, which pertains to the bench warrant request made by Cho Eun-suk's special counsel team. He criticized the motion as "illogical" and "haphazardly constructed." The special counsel team had sought a bench warrant for Rep. Choo on the 3rd, citing allegations of "involvement in an insurrection," and the court's approval for his arrest was communicated to the National Assembly on that same day.
Rep. Choo's team stated that day, "The special counsel team did not discover any direct evidence, such as records showing attendance at meetings to plan martial law in relation to Rep. Choo, or communication logs with individuals involved in enforcing martial law, including the Minister of National Defense," and further noted, "It seems they are attempting to connect his regular duties as floor leader to an awareness or involvement in the martial law plan through forced reasoning." Rep. Choo served as the floor leader for the People Power Party during the emergency martial law declared on December 3 last year. The special counsel argues that before the National Assembly voted to end the emergency martial law, he obstructed People Power Party lawmakers from voting by repeatedly altering the location of the general meeting, thereby participating in the insurrection.
On that day, the special counsel's assertion that "Rep. Choo, as floor leader, turned down People Power Party Leader Han Dong-hoon's request to move to the National Assembly during the martial law" became known. Rep. Choo's team denied this, stating, "There was no refusal; there was simply a discussion of views," and continued, "After confirming that access to the National Assembly was possible, we moved to the National Assembly with Leader Han and other lawmakers, and changed the location of the general meeting, which had originally been scheduled at the party headquarters, to the Budget and Accounts Committee meeting room." They further noted, "The special counsel claims that moving the general meeting from the main plenary hall to the Budget and Accounts Committee meeting room was intended to stop lawmakers from voting, but anyone familiar with the National Assembly would find this claim absurd."
In response to the special counsel's assertion that "by issuing a notice for gathering at the party headquarters, which conflicted with Leader Han’s directive to assemble at the main plenary hall, they hindered People Power Party lawmakers from voting at the main plenary hall," Rep. Choo's team explained, "At that time, law enforcement had restricted access to the National Assembly, so we temporarily directed lawmakers who were unable to enter the National Assembly to gather at the party headquarters." They further mentioned, "After Leader Han's announcement to assemble at the main plenary hall, we did not issue any conflicting notices."
Furthermore, the special counsel stated that when Rep. Choo announced the general meeting would take place at the party headquarters, he contacted People Power Party Leader Han Dong-hoon, who was in the main plenary hall, and instructed him to "come out," which is interpreted as proof of involvement in the insurrection. In addition to Rep. Choo's failure to request the removal of martial law during a two-minute conversation with former President Yoon right after the martial law was declared, they claim he tried to get Leader Han and lawmakers supporting Han out of the main plenary hall.
In reply, Rep. Choo's team said, "At that moment, it was uncertain when the full session would take place," and added, "We only told Leader Han, 'Let's meet with the lawmakers, discuss the party's position, and then go to the plenary hall.'" They denied, "Leader Han claimed right after the martial law announcement that 'the martial law is unconstitutional.' If Leader Han had followed Rep. Choo's advice to leave the plenary hall and meet with the lawmakers, the number of lawmakers voting would have actually risen."
Rep. Choo's team mentioned that day, "Some sections of the arrest motion, which were partially revealed, might cause confusion," and they further noted, "The special prosecutor, who was unable to locate direct proof concerning the 'involvement in insurrection' allegation, created a fragmented and coerced line of reasoning." The National Assembly is set to vote on the arrest motion against Rep. Choo on the 27th.
Thus the article People Power Party Rep. Choo Rejects 'Forced Logic' in Insurrection Case
You are now reading the article People Power Party Rep. Choo Rejects 'Forced Logic' in Insurrection Case with the link addresshttps://www.angkaraja.cfd/2025/11/people-power-party-rep-choo-rejects.html
0 Response to "People Power Party Rep. Choo Rejects 'Forced Logic' in Insurrection Case"
Post a Comment