Judul : Insurrection Special Counsel Denies SOFA Violation in Osan Search
link : Insurrection Special Counsel Denies SOFA Violation in Osan Search
Insurrection Special Counsel Denies SOFA Violation in Osan Search
Cho Eun-seok, the insurrection special counsel team, stated on the 16th that “there was no violation of the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) during the seizure and search of Osan Air Base.” This was a rebuttal after it was revealed that U.S. Forces Korea had sent a protest letter to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
The special counsel team explained during a press briefing that day, “The special counsel’s seizure and search followed the Criminal Procedure Act and did not violate SOFA,” adding, “At the time, investigators received entry permits after obtaining prior approval from the Korean military, which has entry authorization rights under mutual agreements between South Korea and the U.S., and entered under strict control and supervision.”
It further emphasized, “In a location managed by the Korean military, we presented a warrant issued by a judge and, with the approval of the Korean military commander, submitted materials collected from Korean military reconnaissance assets specified in the warrant through mutual consultation,” and stressed, “No search activities were conducted in any other locations.”
The special counsel team conducted the seizure and search on July 21 at the 1st Central Air Defense Control Center (MCRC) of the Korean Air Force Air Defense Command within Osan Base. This was to verify whether the Air Defense Command had sent a cooperation request related to suspicions of a drone operation in Pyongyang between October and November of last year.
David Iverson, Deputy Commander of U.S. Forces Korea, was confirmed to have sent a protest letter to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on the 3rd stating, “We are writing to express concerns regarding the seizure and search conducted by the special counsel. We request an explanation as to why SOFA was not observed in this case.”
Earlier, the special counsel team had explained, “The seizure and search was unrelated to U.S. forces and targeted only materials managed by the Korean military.” However, as controversy resurfaced following the disclosure of the U.S. military’s letter, the team reaffirmed its position that the seizure and search was lawful.
◇ Insurrection Special Counsel: “No Additional Summons for Yoon on Foreign Exchange Charges…Prosecution Pending”
Regarding the investigation into former President Yoon’s foreign exchange charges the previous day, the special counsel team stated, “We have completed all prepared questions and will not summon him again.” It added, “Although former President Yoon refused to answer individual questions, he clarified his stance under the condition that it would not be recorded in the official statement, making the investigation sufficiently meaningful to confirm his attitude toward the foreign exchange charges.”
Former President Yoon voluntarily appeared for questioning after the special counsel attempted to execute an arrest warrant the previous day and was investigated for approximately 8 hours and 40 minutes. He reportedly comprehensively denied the charges, stating, “Treason is not established” and “The Pyongyang drone operation was justified.”
Regarding the timing of prosecution for foreign exchange charges, the special counsel team said, “Given the sensitivity of the case, we are thoroughly cross-checking criminal facts and evidence relationships,” and added, “Prosecution does not immediately follow the conclusion of an investigation. We are finalizing the process.”
Regarding former NIS Director Cho Tae-yong, who was summoned the same day, the team noted, “We understand he actively cooperated without refusing to testify,” and stated, “Questions were asked regarding most of the charges under investigation by the special counsel.”
Meanwhile, regarding plans to re-request an arrest warrant for former Minister of Justice Park Sung-jae, the team said, “We will collect additional indirect circumstances or materials that could indicate Park’s awareness of the illegality of the emergency martial law and reapply for the warrant shortly after strengthening the case.”
Thus the article Insurrection Special Counsel Denies SOFA Violation in Osan Search
You are now reading the article Insurrection Special Counsel Denies SOFA Violation in Osan Search with the link addresshttps://www.angkaraja.cfd/2025/10/insurrection-special-counsel-denies.html
0 Response to "Insurrection Special Counsel Denies SOFA Violation in Osan Search"
Post a Comment